
This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP141: Initiate the development of Centrifuge V3, a multi-chain, EVM based protocol

The proposal seeks governance approval to initiate the development of Centrifuge V3, an EVM-based protocol, to drive the next phase of growth for the RWA market. Built as a multi-chain system, this next-generation protocol will introduce features such as chain abstraction, modularity for diverse assets and investors, and enhanced composability with DeFi. The protocol will also migrate governance and CFG token support to an EVM chain, aligning with the ecosystem where the majority of Centrifuge’s activity already resides. This initiative positions Centrifuge to lead the rapidly growing RWA space and meet the evolving needs of institutions and DeFi participants.


- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP141/CP141.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp141-initiate-the-development-of-centrifuge-v3-a-multi-chain-evm-based-protocol/6734

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP141: Initiate the development of Centrifuge V3, a multi-chain, EVM based protocol

This snapshot vote, if passed, will approve CP128 and make amendments to our funding process for treasury proposals (CP2).

Implications:
* Introduce a milestone based funding process
* Make changes to the template used for funding requests

Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP128/CP128.md
Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp128-amendments-to-cp2-component/6549/1

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please cast your vote by voting **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP128: Amendments to CP2 component

This snapshot vote, if passed, will approve CP130 in order to reach an agreement in the Centrifuge DAO that the goal of resource allocation from the Centrifuge Treasury should always support the mission of Centrifuge and to this end, resources should be allocated to the proposals that can make the case for the highest return and highest impact for Centrifuge according to clear goals and themes.

Implications:
* All proposals should connect to the wider Centrifuge goals, and specify which goals your proposal meets and how
* Proposals must specialize in one or more of the Themes and list which Theme(s) are applicable

Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP130.md
Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp130-goals-and-themes-for-resource-allocation-for-the-centrifuge-treasury/6564

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please cast your vote by voting **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP130: Goals and Themes for Resource Allocation for Centrifuge DAO Treasury

This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP103: Launch an RWA Lending Market

Proposal to create an RWA-focused lending market to give users the ability to lend and borrow against eligible pool tokens.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP103/CP103.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp103-launch-an-rwa-lending-market/6346

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.


CP103: Launch an RWA Lending Market

This proposal, if passed, will approve our migration to OpenGov with the suggested tracks and parameters. Some changes will also be made to our governance process as a result of an accepted migration. 

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP108/CP108.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-centrifuge-migration-to-opengov/5984

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP108: Centrifuge Migration to OpenGov

This proposal, if passed, will approve the agreements for how to manage the funds in the Centrifuge Treasury. This is an update to the existing agreement that passed with CP58.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP107.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updated-treasury-spending-agreement/6290/1

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP107: Updated Treasury Spending Agreement


This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP105: Data Protocol (Technical Proposal) 
Proposal to introduce the Data Protocol, a further development of the Private Offchain Data (POD) within the Centrifuge network, enabling secure data storage, collaboration, and sharing functionalities.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP105/CP105.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp105-data-protocol-technical-proposal/6344

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP105: Data Protocol (Technical Proposal) 

This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP104: Financial Reporting.
Proposal to build standardised real-time financial reporting for Centrifuge pools based on the data made available in the subquery.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP104.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp104-financial-reporting/6351

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP104: Financial Reporting

This OpenSquare snapshot is to get a **temperature check** of what the sentiment is around the Treasury Proposal from Tangem Wallet to integrate Centrifuge and Altair into their wallet.

The initial proposal mentions 500 branded wallets (2-card set) + integration of CFG/AIR + delivery for a total cost of $16,470. Based on the input in the forum post and [Governance Call 26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvRNtiwHSFY) from the DAO, more options are provided (including the total cost).

Read the full proposal and discussion [here](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-integration-of-the-network-into-tangem-and-production-of-500-branded-centrifuge-wallets-2-card-sets/6332).

Option 2 includes customised boxes instead of branded wallets.

Note, that **this vote does not determine the outcome** of this proposal - an onchain proposal is still required in order for it to pass.

Please vote on **one** of the three options below.

Proposal to integrate CFG + AIR into Tangem

This proposal, if passed, will approve the Roadmap Proposal 1  proposed by PEG.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP87.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp87-roadmap-proposal-1/6077

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**,  **No** or **Abstain**.

CP87: Roadmap Proposal 1

This proposal, if passed, will give a mandate to the OpenGov Technical Committee.

The initial members will be seeded in the same runtime upgrade that implements OpenGov on both Centrifuge and Altair, respectively.

Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP86.md

Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-opengov-technical-committee-mandate-request/6085

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP86: OpenGov Technical Committee Mandate Request

This proposal, if passed, will introduce and add different pool fees for different types of pools.

- Link to the proposal on Github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP83.md
- Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp83-updating-cp28-centrifuge-protocol-fees/6022

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No **or **Abstain**.

CP83: Updating CP28 Centrifuge Protocol Fees

If passed, this proposal will discontinue Centrifuge Crowdloan rewards claiming 60 days after the date this proposal passes (if passed).

- Link to the proposal on Github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP84.md
- Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp84-unclaimed-polkadot-rewards/6035

Do you agree with this proposal?

CP84: Unclaimed Polkadot Rewards

If passed, this proposal will discontinue rewards claiming on Tinlake 30 days after the date this proposal passes (if passed) and transfer any remaining tokens from the Tinlake wallet to the Centrifuge DAO Treasury wallet.

Link to the proposal on Github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP81.md
Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-unclaimed-tinlake-rewards/5885

- Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No **or **Abstain**.

CP81: Unclaimed Tinlake Rewards

This proposal, if passed, would introduces an additional component to the transaction fee that will be transferred to the treasury for each transaction in addition to the standard weight-based fee system that is part of any Substrate based chain.

Link to proposal on github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP74.md
Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-transaction-fees-for-pools/5773/

- Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP74: Updating Transaction Fees for Pools

This proposal, if passed, would amend the current POP V2 process to the new POP v3 process which would simplify the Pool Onboarding Process (POP) by making it more similar to other Centrifuge Governance processes, which use the formula of Request for Comment (RFC) followed by discussion (during this discussion period the Centrifuge Credit Group can choose to put forward an assessment) and then a vote. It would also make it a faster, simpler, and clearer process.

- Link to proposal on github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP68/CP68.md
- Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-update-the-pool-onboarding-proposal-for-open-pools-pop-version-3/5698

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote Yes, No or Abstain.

CP68: Update the Pool Onboarding Proposal for Open Pools (POP) – Version 3

This proposal, if passed, will introduce three different types of pools on Centrifuge and define them:

- Open Pools
- Closed Pools
- Portfolio Pools

**Do you agree with this proposal?**

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

See the full proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP63.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-definitions-of-pool-types-categories/5688

CP63: Definitions of Pool Types & Categories

This proposal will
- extend the versatility of the Centrifuge protocol

Linked Pools are an extension of functionality for on-chain pools beyond the existing asset-financing logic. This feature will allow so-called “linked” pools to be funded directly by another pool where the system was previously limited to fund only assets.

**Do you agree with this proposal?**

Please vote **Yes** or **No**.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP59.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-linked-pools-technical-proposal/5569

CP59: Linked Pools

The objective of this proposal is to make the following agreements as a DAO:

- We agree to be diligent and conservative in spending of CFG from the on-chain Treasury.
- We agree to try to learn from the mistakes of other DAOs before us so that Centrifuge may spend its Treasury funds more wisely, and thereby give it a greater chance at succeeding in its mission.
- We agree to not start a broader grants program at the current time.
- We agree to raise the minimum quorum requirement to 66% of the council voting yes in order for treasury spending proposals to be passed.
  - This is an increase from the currently implemented 55% minimum quorum and should be added to the language in [CP2](https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP2/CP2.md).
  - This will need to be reassessed upon a possible move to Open Gov.

These agreements apply to all Centrifuge community members and those making proposals to the DAO treasury.

**Do you agree with this proposal?**

Please vote **Yes** or **No**.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP58.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-treasury-spending-agreement/5575



CP58: Treasury Spending Agreement

If this OpenSquare snapshot passes, it will move this proposal forward to an on-chain proposal to:


- List CFG in the Omnipool on HydraDX
- Mint 500,000 CFG into the HydraDX Omnipool account 7L53bUTBbfuj14UpdCNPwmgzzHSsrsTWBHX5pys32mVWM3C1

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **<ins>Yes</ins>** or **<ins>No</ins>**.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP53.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-listing-cfg-in-hydradx-omnipool-seeding-initial-liquidity/5412

CP53(GI): Listing CFG in HydraDX Omnipool & seeding initial liquidity 

**Good day Community**
Based on my proposal and the discussion in this [RFC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-renewal-rwa-market-rewards-proposal-12-09-2022/4565), I am moving this proposal forward to a snapshot vote for the community to vote on.

- **Proposal:** **Do you agree to mint 100 000 CFG to the AAVE rewards wallet for the next period 05/10/2022 - 05/1/2023?**

Please cast your vote and thank you for participating.

<ins>Snapshot voting parameters:</ins>
1. Minimum threshold for successful vote - 5 000 000 CFG.
2. The snapshot will be closed 26.09.2022.

<ins>Manual how to vote on via Subsquare:</ins>  https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/snapshot-voting-what-where-how-and-when/4490

**Remember, that you don’t lose your CFG tokens by voting on Subsquare nor you are locking** **them.**

Snapshot vote: Renewal RWA Market rewards proposal (12-09-2022)


**Good day Community**
Based on my proposal and the discussion in this [RFC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-2022-09-09-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation/4553), I am moving this proposal forward to a snapshot vote for the community to vote on.

- **Proposal:** **Do you agree to mint 1 800 000 CFG to the Tinlake rewards wallet?**

Please cast your vote and thank you for participating.

<ins>Snapshot voting parameters:</ins>
1. Minimum threshold for successful vote - 5 000 000 CFG.
2. The snapshot will be closed 23.09.2022.

<ins>Manual how to vote on via Subsquare:</ins>  https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/snapshot-voting-what-where-how-and-when/4490

Remember, that you don’t lose your CFG tokens by voting on Subsquare nor you are locking them. 

Snapshot vote: 2022-09-09 Updating Tinlake Rewards Allocation

**Good day Community**
Based on my proposal and the discussion in this [RFC](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-2022-09-09-updating-tinlake-rewards-allocation/4553), I am moving this proposal forward to a snapshot vote for the community to vote on.

- **Proposal:** **Do you agree to mint 1 800 000 CFG to the Tinlake rewards wallet?**

Please cast your vote and thank you for participating.

<ins>Manual how to vote on via Subsquare:</ins>  https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/snapshot-voting-what-where-how-and-when/4490

Remember, that you don’t lose your CFG tokens by voting on Subsquare nor you are locking them. 

<ins>Snapshot voting parameters:</ins>
1. Minimum threashold for successeful vote - 5 000 000 CFG.
2. The snapshot will be closed 23.09.2022.

